What the Government Told Parliament About Student Mental Health

The Figures Given to Parliament

The reply covers schools, higher education, coaching centres, teacher training and the national tele-mental health helpline. Four of its figures are specific.

The helpline figure has moved furthest. A reply to the same house in July 2024 put Tele-MANAS at roughly 11.76 lakh calls. The Ministry now reports 43.25 lakh, alongside a mobile application and a video consultation option added to what began as an audio service. The helpline operates in 20 languages.

Call volume records how often people reach the service. It does not record what happened after the call, and it can climb for reasons unrelated to need, such as publicity or the addition of new channels.

Different Language for Different Sectors

The reply uses binding language about schools and softer language about universities.

The Central Board of Secondary Education has mandated counsellors and wellness teachers in every affiliated secondary and senior secondary school. The Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti provides for two counsellors, one male and one female, in each of its schools. Kendriya Vidyalayas have been directed to appoint counsellors on a contractual basis.

Higher education follows a different path. The University Grants Commission issued an advisory in January 2023 circulating the National Suicide Prevention Strategy. It published guidelines in April 2023 on academic and peer pressure, stress and career concerns. The Ministry then circulated a framework in July 2023 covering counselling services, early identification of distress, standard operating procedures for suicide prevention, student support networks and periodic institutional reviews.

An advisory reaches an institution. A mandate obliges it. The reply describes no mechanism for checking whether colleges acted on the 2023 framework, and reports no figures on how many did.

Draft UGC guidelines published in January 2026 would change that. They followed the Supreme Court's judgment in Sukdeb Saha vs State of Andhra Pradesh, which directed that India adopt a uniform mental health policy for higher education. Those guidelines remain in draft.

What the 830 Figure Can Support

The reply states that 830 counsellors worked in Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas as of February 2026, on contracts, against a provision of two per school.

It does not give the number of schools. Without it, 830 cannot be converted into a coverage rate, and the reply makes no claim about coverage. Anyone describing the provision as adequate or inadequate on this evidence supplies a denominator the document does not contain.

The Kendriya Vidyalaya direction carries the same limitation. The reply records the instruction to appoint counsellors, and describes the contractual arrangement as being for the time being, but gives no figure for posts filled.

Parliamentary answers address the question asked. This question concerned measures taken, not their reach.

What Individual Campuses Are Doing

Unusually for a reply of this kind, the Ministry named institutions and dates.

It held National Wellbeing Conclaves at IIT Hyderabad in November 2024 and IIT Bombay in November 2025, and a regional workshop at IIT Madras on 12 and 13 July 2026, bringing together institutional leaders and faculty alongside students and mental health professionals.

IIT Kharagpur runs a framework it calls SETU, covering preventive and round-the-clock support. IIT Madras, IIT Delhi, IIT Guwahati, IIT Gandhinagar and IIT Roorkee have run workshops on mental wellness and stress management. The Ministry states that every IIT, IIM, NIT and IIIT operates a mental health or counselling centre staffed by counsellors, clinical psychologists and, in some cases, psychiatrists.

Under the Malaviya Mission Teacher Training Programme, faculty attend two fortnightly sessions designed to help them recognise student mental health concerns and intervene early. Of everything in the reply, this comes closest to gatekeeper training: it teaches the people students already approach to notice difficulty and act on it.

The reply also covers coaching centres. Guidelines issued in January 2024 require counselling facilities and transparent fees. They also restrict batch segregation, the practice of sorting students by performance.

Provision Is Counted. Outcomes Are Elsewhere.

Every figure in the reply measures something supplied: cells opened, calls answered, counsellors engaged, centres upgraded, workshops held, campaign material translated into 21 languages.

None reports whether student suicides rose or fell.

The reply says where that number lives. It opens by noting that the National Crime Records Bureau compiles suicide data from cases recorded by police, and publishes student suicide figures by year, State, gender and age group in its annual Accidental Deaths & Suicides in India reports. Provision and outcome therefore sit in two documents, produced by two ministries, that nobody is required to read against each other.

Establishing that a helpline or a counsellor prevented a death is genuinely difficult, and neither dataset supports that kind of causal claim. The separation is not unusual. It does mean this reply records what India has built rather than what it has changed.

What it has built is substantial. A national helpline in 20 languages, mental health inside the primary care package at 1.81 lakh centres, counsellors mandated across CBSE schools, and a Supreme Court judgment pushing higher education towards a uniform standard. None of that existed ten years ago.

Where This Leaves Institutions

For a school or college, the practical reading is narrow. Counselling provision is now expected rather than optional, and higher education is moving the same way. The framework circulated in July 2023 already asks institutions to identify distress early and to hold standard operating procedures for suicide prevention. Neither waits on the draft guidelines being finalised.

Training the staff students already approach is the cheapest part of that work, and the part most often left until last.

• arrow_right_alt The Rural Safety Net: Accessing help for Farmers & Wage Earners
• arrow_right_alt Funding the Future: Government Schemes for Women and Youth